Intersectionality: Resources for Reflection and Conversation
We chose intersectionality as the theme of the 5th international CREA Conference because we wanted to expand conversations and make new connections—both intellectual and interpersonal. This bibliography represents our journey in preparation for the conference, inclusive of resources identified during the conference and those harvested after the conference.We leave this document as a resources for further study of this important topic. Enjoy!
Karen E. Kirkhart, Stafford Hood, Rodney K. Hopson and Melvin E. Hall
Intersectionality as Critical Inquiry, Method and Practice: Moving Beyond Nominal Categories and False Dichotomies in Culturally Responsive Evaluation and Assessment
Center for Culturally Responsive Evaluation and Assessment (CREA)
Fifth International Conference
Chicago, Illinois
March 27-29, 2019
(Pre-Conference Workshops , March 26)
Stafford Hood, PhD
Sheila M. Miller Professor Founding Director, Center for Culturally Responsive Evaluation and Assessment College of Education University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Purpose
Escalating domestic and global tensions in social, political, and economic institutions require that we urgently expand how we conceptualize our work, to end under-representation of the issues facing People of Color. When we frame the issues and opportunities that define our work, understanding intersectionality is essential if we are to avoid prioritizing the needs of some over the conditions of others. Too often we ignore the cumulative effect on those at the intersection of multiple sources of inequity. Refining our lens to see these issues more clearly is of paramount importance to culturally responsive practice.
Themes
The CREA 2019 theme of Intersectionality as Critical Inquiry, Method and Practice will focus on the following areas as pertaining to program evaluation, measurement, and assessment:
Problematizing arbitrary categories and false dichotomies
Cultural responsiveness drawing upon multiple perspectives of meaning
Reexamining professional practice to incorporate and promote intersectional understanding
Policies and practices of influence and consequence in the quest for social justice
Ethical challenges in maximizing justice with intersecting areas of inquiry
Rejecting use of intersectionality to eclipse strategic examination of the component issues